Quote:
Originally posted by RougeUnderoos+Oct 18 2004, 06:12 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RougeUnderoos @ Oct 18 2004, 06:12 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-FlamesAllTheWay@Oct 18 2004, 05:53 PM
I hate how now on CNN after every presodential debate they have bring out that senior political analyst guy to tell everyone how wrong both candiates 'facts' were. Nothing is ever really proven to be true, it's just a bunch of B.S.
|
Venturing away from Crossfire...
You hate that part? I think it's one of the best parts of their coverage. It's non-partisan at least. The problem with it is that after it's all over, nobody ever brings it up again. They are caught with an outright lie or obvious misrepresentation of the facts and nobody "holds their feet to the fire" on it. That bugs me -- it's like lieing and BSing are just part of the game. [/b][/quote]
Okay, I should of worded that a bit differently. I like that part the best out of the debates, I just hate the fact that it has to be done. If these 'facts' that are stated actually had some truth to them, we wouldn't need people to come on afterwards and clarify everything for us.
And yeah, people seem to have come to expect this kind of stuff in politics today which bothers me too...