[Slava]

Originally Posted by Stealth22

More detailed news story: http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/boy-s-s...bill-1.2179676

Supreme Court Judgement: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/...15BCSC0011.htm

The kid broke the heat sensor, which set the sprinkler off. Ergo, he's responsible. Plain and simple.

What are people going to say next? That the kid who owned the padlock was responsible because he didn't try and grab his lock back? Or because he dared the kid to do it?

Well reading the judgment that kid is an idiot. His audience tried to convince him and he just wouldn't listen. I mean if he had no idea and it was unforseen then that' one thing, but this kid knew and just didn't care.