01-09-2015, 11:35 AM
|
#81
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I imagine (if it's allowed under the CBA) he could work out a retirement payment or an office position, which the Flames would want to do in exchange for getting a freed up spot in the 50 pro contract limit.
|
This wouldn't be allowed under the CBA. They consider it circumvention.
Quote:
Preamble. It is the parties' intention that there be full, accurate and timely disclosure and reporting of all revenues and financial information as required by Article 50, as well as of any and all agreements involving payments to Players, and that such disclosures and agreements be consistent with this Agreement, including but not limited to the provisions of Article 50. This
Article 26 is designed to prohibit and prevent conduct that Circumvents the terms of this Agreement, while not deterring or prohibiting conduct permitted by this Agreement, the latter conduct not being a Circumvention.
26.15 Examples of Circumvention. The following is a non-exhaustive list of activities that either constitute a Circumvention under this Article 26 or from which a Circumvention may be inferred:
(e) A Club and a Player, during the Player's active career, agree that upon the Player's retirement, he will receive a sum of money for services to be provided to the Club after retirement.
|
|
|
|