Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
If it's premature to express doubts about Klimchuk's development, then is it premature to express optimism about Poirier's? Or can only critical assessments be premature?
|
If you're talking about an accurate assessment no, someone simply going out to bash someone for the simple need to bash is another thing. There's nothing statistically other than a cut from the WJC team that indicates Klimchuk is a plug or is regressing in his development.
I'd totally understand if there was something to warrant the "critical assessment" but at this point there really isn't.
Some things about Klimchuk do need to mentioned like his constant injuries.
Could still add about 10 lbs, needs to shoot more.
This is not a critical assessment:
"Klimchuk has been a disappointment almost on every level" . That's biased opinion.