After having a lot more games to listen to him:
his play by play is alright. not great, not bad, but just so-so
His rampant flames homerism was nice at first when the flames were winning but now it's just like listening to a few guys at a local pub talk about the flames. gotta change
his kind of passive aggressive "OH I DIDNT MEAN IT THAT WAY" kind of stuff with the rest of the fan960 staff(this includes stienberg, morning show, loubo, etc) is also not too enjoyable to listen to
overall its passable but a real step down from maher. anyone would be though. my main concern is that while peter was a realist when it came to the flames, he tried to put a positive spin on things. he never ever was a straight up fanboy
|