Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
No my point was that neither measure is really telling you an accurate story. Critics would like the Flames more if we were scoring less often and causing more rebounds, just seems funny.
Instead the storylines should be about if/how the Flames are generating higher probability scoring chances, while limiting the other teams'.
|
But you're vastly overestimating how many lost rebound opportunities are being missed because of the Flames' higher shooting percentage. I won't bore you with the numbers, but if the Flames' shooting percentage was 2% lower, they'd have probably generated 1-2 more shots over the season to date as a result of rebounds. It basically has zero effect.