Quote:
Originally Posted by bizkitgto
I've been back and fourth on man made climate change for years, and there's a lot of BS on both sides of the argument, and there's plenty of experts arguning on all sides of this debate and I'm not sure we will ever know what is actually the truth (politics have muddied the waters too much anyway). Beter pollution control, advances in energy efficiency and conservation are absolutely paramount and should be something we're striving to acheive.
Up until very recently, the idea that solar variability drove climate was taken as a given. It was only in recent decades that there was a claimed "deviation" between climate and the solar cycles. But as we have been finding out, more and more over the last 2+ years, is that much of this "deviation" could be due to the very "adjustments" that have been made to the temperature data, ostensibly to correct for various kinds of measurement errors.
|
No, there's not. There's lobbies and paid 'professionals' arguing against man made climate change,
but in over 30,000 scientific papers about the subject last year, only one argued against it.
Sorry, you're listening to the wrong people. The smartest people on the planet have confirmed it, the UN and other world organizations are behind it. There is not good arguments on both sides. There is fact, and there is spin. That's the two sides right now.