I never claimed to be an expert on solving crimes. However you say solving a homicide is based on a congolmerate of circumstantial evidence. This is something a psychic cannot provide, because their "powers" are based purely their ability to make people think they know something when they actually don't; their ability to make a whole bunch of guesses and rely on the perception that those guesses were right.
How will that help a murder investigation; what circumstantial evidence does that provide? In what way is a psychic a useful tool for an investigation?
Again, as troutman posted, "there is no credible scientific evidence that psychic power ever solved a crime."
Maybe they should use the psychics that predicted 9/11. Oh wait, they can't. That's because there were none. Zero.
If I had a loved one murdered, I can honestly say I would be irate if I found the police were wasting their time consulting with a psychic.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|