Quote:
Originally posted by TheCommodoreAfro+Oct 17 2004, 11:54 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (TheCommodoreAfro @ Oct 17 2004, 11:54 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Displaced Flames fan@Oct 17 2004, 02:17 PM
I thought I made it perfectly clear.
Nothing I have heard Kerry admit to....or that I have heard him accused of.....is an 'attrocity' by my defninition.
|
My question is what did Kerry do?
The word atrocity used in this case is a sweeping generalization. It makes me think of Darfur.
By saying he committed attrocities by his own definition, what is it - as you asked? Were they atrocities to him because he doesn't want to take a stranger's life? Or did he and his swiftboat crew go Mai Lai on someone?
Labels in this instance don't help get dialog anywhere closer to the truth. 'Attrocities' is one of those words that needs to be defined in concrete terms. That was my point.
We could easily just dismiss GW as a crackhead in the same manner. [/b][/quote]
What is wrong with you?
Did you not read the transcript from the Cavett show in which John Kerry describes exactly what he DID do?
Why are you attacking me? I haven't extrapolated ANY meaning from anything Kerry said, I simply brought it to light.
Unbelievable.