Quote:
Originally posted by sjwalter+Oct 17 2004, 07:04 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sjwalter @ Oct 17 2004, 07:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:
Originally posted by CaramonLS@Oct 17 2004, 12:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter
|
Quote:
@Oct 17 2004, 06:53 PM
I never said he should have stayed around, but he never had to go home and accuse them of being baby killers, while they were still fighting the war.
It might have been the wrong war at the wrong place at the wrong time, but Kerry never had a right to accuse them of what they did if he did the same things.
|
The sheer idiocy of you logic is astounding... WHY THE HELL Shouldn't Kerry go and tell what he saw happening in Nam? Why?
If people are killing babies, raping people, the public has a right to know that. If you want to have the wool pulled over your eyes you can be alone in your ignorance.
|
Because Kerry himself did the same thing.
I wouldn't want someone who has in their past shown that they've been anti-war, accusing those that he served with of crimes whether he and they did them or not to be my CIC.
Especially at a time like this when the US is full fledged involved in the War on Terror.
And here is the history of Kerry, may be bias but most can be backed up.
http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2004...rise_of_th.html [/b][/quote]
Kerry raped people? Kerry Killed Babies?
Wow you are really reaching here.
Not to mention you are citing stuff from an online blog?