Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay
Fenwick just thinks that Corsi is meant to be a proxy for scoring chances, not play control per se. This is why he omits blocked shots.
My argument is basically: 1. The whole (or perhaps best) use of Corsi is to have objective figures that can be used as a proxy for scoring chances (what else are you using it for?).
2. A shot that is blocked is either a) not a scoring chance at all, or b) on average from a worse scoring area than shots/posts/missed shots.
He wrote that in 2007, and I feel like 7 years later there are a lot more blocked shots, even those from the slot, so I'm not sure how useful argument 2 is anymore.
|
Are we trying to measure scoring chances or possession? I think possession, in which case even for a blocked shot you possessed the puck, so it should count.