Quote:
Originally Posted by CKPThunder
I always thought, and correct me if I am wrong, that Poirier was a special case. Burke signed Poirier before Jan 1 last year which I thought allowed Poirier's contract to slide this year. If this is the case, wouldn't his contract slide if he played less than 10 games in the NHL this year?
I realize that Poirier can move at will but I was thinking that if his contract status is such that it would slide into next year then maybe the Flames are going to be a bit more cautious in terms of bringing him up unless absolutely necessary.
If his contract doesn't slide, then please disregard my rabble.
|
Yes, you're correct. Poirier is considered an 18 year-old signing because he signed his contract in calendar year 2013 (and was 18 on September 15, 2013). His ELC slid last season and will also slide this year if he plays less than 10 NHL games.