View Single Post
Old 11-16-2014, 03:00 PM   #93
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Circa89 View Post
I knew I was going to forget an obvious one. Yes, Raymond in his small sample size was a good pick up and probably Treliving's biggest move to "replace" cammellari.

I'm still very nervous about his first big trade.
So Raymond is a small sample size while the "bad" moves aren't?

No one expected much from Seto and Diaz (thus the PTO and late off-season signing). If they worked out great, if not you waive them and cut your losses.

Engelland was expected to be a 3rd pair dman, hes had some decent moments and some bad. They overpaid to keep the term low. In the long-term he's here for cap and to provide some leadership.

Bollig was a waste.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote