What is the substantive, evidence based argument that Obama should be operating differently than he currently is?
Where is the evidence that this project will create more than a few thousand short term jobs?
Where is the evidence of how this will benefit the US economy?
Where is the evidence that this will do anything to help greenhouse gas emissions which the US has just recently pledged to reduce?
Sounds like a lot of crying that he won't just do what other people want him to do.
So far, the only argument I've seen to the contrary is that energy = good and that rail is worse than pipelines.
|