View Single Post
Old 11-13-2014, 08:38 AM   #60
waner
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by driveway View Post
So ... you think moving 5 active players on our roster, during the season, before the trade deadline is realistic? How long have you been a hockey fan?

Here were the players we traded away last year.

Berra
Stempniak
Nemisz
Jackman
Horak

Of those, only Jackman and Stempniak were roster players getting traded in-season and Stempniak was a deadline day move.

Thinking about trades is fun, but there is no way the Flames are going to find trading partners to move five players, of whom ... I would say Hudler is the only one who would garner serious interest from other teams and three of whom have NTC's in their contracts: Raymond, Glencross, and Wideman.
Glencross would garner more interest than Hudler as he is a better player with less money and less term.

Sure some have NTCs but no play-offs and another year or two of rebuilding could easily influence them to waive, guys with no trade clauses get moved all the time.

Defencemen are at a premium so finding homes for Snid and Wideman should be possible. I also wouldn't want anything but late picks back for them. Raymond is on a cheap deal and the type of guys contenders add all the time. Hudler and Glencross should have multiple suitors and Setoguchi I would just waive/release so no need to find a place for him.

The Flames have more bodies than spots and this is s good year to move excess vets out and try to start shaping the roster for next year. You are right though GMs tend to be s conservative group and hold on to guys way longer than need be so we probably see one move and a continued log jam of mediocre players on the roster.
waner is offline   Reply With Quote