Quote:
Originally posted by RougeUnderoos+Oct 16 2004, 02:18 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (RougeUnderoos @ Oct 16 2004, 02:18 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-sjwalter@Oct 16 2004, 02:54 PM
I wonder if we need a Terroist Attack again to wake some people up that we are in a time of war and Kerry is not a war president because like he ran home from Vietnam he will run from the terroists.# Of course he just thinks of them as a nuisance right?
|
Ha ha that's good. George Bush (and his VP) do everything under the sun to avoid going to Viet Nam, and a guy who volunteered to go is the coward.
The draft dodger is the war hero, the combat veteran is the candyass. Got it. [/b][/quote]
Exactly my point. Both Kerry and Bush have records they can't avoid, its just that Kerry's has been brought out more.
I don't believe half of it, for the media does good if they get 1 in 10 things right. I am talking about what everyone said about Kerry.
Kerry was an anti-war protesters including many other things, Bush was a drunk, messed up whatever you want to call him. Who do the people vote for?
To me its pointless bringing up the records of the past against presidental candidates because like many have said here, a person can change after 30 years, just like its seems both Bush and Kerry have.