This is a good example of one side completely ignoring what the other side is saying. V says this (just the main points)
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
Really? We're questioning the necessity?
...
I'm glad Ryz posted a picture of these girls. If that's a highly sexualized representation of women, than I don't know what planet I'm living on anymore. We have a similar crew up here in the chuck, and I never once considered that it wasn't family entertainment when my 7 year old son came to a game with me.
|
He seems fine with it. Seems to think it's silly that we're even questioning their necessity.
But because he disagrees when someone illogically says these girls get to choose what their uniform is (which isn't true in any job with a uniform):
Quote:
Originally Posted by V
They dress the way they're told, not necessarily the way they want.
|
He gets these responses:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ExiledFlamesFan
Please stop treating these women like idiots.
...
This whole "let's save women from themselves" argument is shamefully sexist. What right as a man do you have to tell women what to wear?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_
Men being up in arms over the oppression of women by objectification, then trying to fix it by telling them to cover up is some seriously tragic irony.
|
Can someone, anyone of Exiled, BBQ, or Q, point out where V suggested in any sense that these women were idiots, where he tried to oppress them, where he tried to save them from himself?
How did V, who (if I'm reading it right) said their outfits didn't seem overly sexual or remotely inappropriate, become an oppressor of women?
Come on.
EDIT: To add extra clarity, you're aware that not wanting something isn't the same as not being okay with it, right? The two aren't logically equivalent.