View Single Post
Old 10-26-2014, 06:36 PM   #2340
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firecenter View Post
Firepark doesnt provide the space or appropriate infrastructure for a development like this. Zero opportunity for a ROI for the owners at this location.
Fire park, would provide the space, the tenants displaced would be allot cheaper than the ones at either of the other suggested locations.

It is also just as accessible to the LRT as either of the other options.

and WAY! more accessible for roadways.

The problem with Fire Park is they have been clear they want a vibrant down town location. And Fire Park is not that.

The current McMahon & Balzac are out for the same reasons.

I don't think it will be North of the current building because of the comments that it will be transit accessible, and transit to that area is probably at least 5 years further away than an arena.

And its pretty much been stated returning to stampede park is out.

So that leaves Sunalta. If they only need 25 acres for their development, it will be allot more vertical than I expect, so Sunalta make even more sense. With Land being the biggest concern for that location and the Train Station already being Elevated.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to #-3 For This Useful Post: