Quote:
Originally Posted by J epworth kendal
I wonder what legally changed that allows them to arrest them now. Listening to the CBC podcast The House last week they were talking about this group, and saying they couldn't arrest them because they hadn't technically committed any crimes. I want to re-listen it to remember exactly what they were saying, but if these sources are correct, it shows that this might have been part of a larger plan then, or they are just using this incidence as evidence that others were complicit in the attacks.
|
"Rounding them up" could just be a matter of detaining them for questioning, and in the case of any with links to the shooter possibly arresting them. By and large though, there should be nothing much they can do without proof of involvement in this or other offences. My guess is they're just paying some visits, rather than actually taking them into custody.