Quote:
Originally posted by hulkrogan+Oct 15 2004, 09:35 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (hulkrogan @ Oct 15 2004, 09:35 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-KevanGuy@Oct 15 2004, 02:48 PM
I won't be going anywhere that fingerprints me to get in. Thats ridiculous. I'm not a fan of ID scanning either. The name's Shackleford, Rusty Shackleford.
|
Why would you be objected to ID scans if you have nothing to hide?
Its well worth the inconvenience of waiting for 3 seconds for them to scan your id to know that the troublemakers are going to be denied access for your safety.
Tron_fdc: I'll bring the matches
[/b][/quote]
Ah, the most persuasive argument in favour of increased id scanning. "If you've got nothing to hide, what's the problem?".
I hate the thought of constant identifcation, but that notion is pretty compelling.