Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
We are becoming predictable. I figured you would respond noting that my post eliminates me from suspicion. I fully acknowledge it does and that was not the point of it.
I think you are missing what I am trying to say though. I wasn't looking for the bottom 3 posters or voters. I was looking for posting habits vs voting habits. To me it makes sense that an active poster is an active voter and vice versa. So who is an active poster and an inactive voter? I looked at the delta between post position and vote position.
Of the three you listed 1 was already in my list and the others have a delta of 1 so weren't included.
Rathji is 16 in votes and 17th so delta is one
Hmm is 17 in votes 16 in posts so delta is one
HG was on my original vote list.
The number in the first column is your list of votes including unvotes put into order (thanks for digging this out). The number in second column is the post order. I was looking at who had a high delta in number of posts and identified them.
Hg- 5
Drury 5
Girly 8
puxlut 6
|
Did you take into account when calculating delta that some vote numbers have a tie so "placement" isn't a cut and dry 1-22? If Rathi and hmmhmmcamo both have 4 votes, they can't be 16th and 17th place, they are in the same place for votes.
I don't think Delta is the most effective way to determine position. I get the theory you are trying to get at (granted standard deviation might have been the route I went to get results), but I think because you've placed votes cast as a 1-22, you are getting placement numbers that aren't reflective of the fact a number of people are at the same vote total. You are 1, Oiling_Roachman and starseed are both 2.