Okay, part two - general strategy talk.
I looked back to where I voted against hmmm. Nothing hmmm has said since then has changed my mind on them. There is a decent amount of posts, but again not a lot of content. I'll need more at this point to change my mind. Always thought hmmm was scummy, and their deflecting posts confirm that for me at this time.
The more GGG posts, the more GGG seems weird. It really puts me on the fence. On the one hand, they are scum hunting and want a lot of information out in the open, which I definitely advocate. However, GGG always seems to be voting against the grain and is not in tune with the town. On my radar at this point.
Baxter's posts always seem out of context as if they are pre-planned and then don't fit the discussion that is currently going on. I think there is a general agreement that asking ECF to use their power on a specific person would be not be a good idea, but Baxter jumps in here and tries to get us talking about that again. I guess what I'm saying is Baxter's posts seem to be disjointed with normal conversations, which seem like they are pre-planned (something mafia would likely do).
For townies, I've put Oiling in my book as the most townie yet. He continues to apply pressure on those who seem funny, have posts that contradict, and have deflecting posts. This is great interrogating in my view, and makes me favour him as town.
That's is for now - would still like to see a few more votes fall with reasons. Six are still unvoted at this time - I think it's time to step up on Monday.
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
|