That is really bad analysis, I'm disappointed...
He almost has a point deeply entrenched in a sloth of inaccurate assumptions that clearly show a lack of following for the Flames pre-season player developments.
And he even states that point wrong. It's not about weather the Flames should tank or not - it's more about weather to keep the kids up and be a. 500 team (or with surprises slightly above) or send them down and by product of that let them develop but also be in the sweepstakes come draft time.
Overall unimpressed and as an "insider" clearly he should stick to his inside relationship with the Leads as its his obvious forte.
|