Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar
I guess its time I should defend myself, as some accusations have been pointed my way
-Yes I was in on killing RD, it was incorrect but I can't say I fault the decision which was pretty much a consensus by that point.
|
Heavily disagree with this. Up until close to RatherDashing's lynch I thought the general consensus was to give everyone a chance at one more post to talk and use/tell us about their powers. That was until a couple members decided that we had to lynch right away which I think was misguided. We had like 19 votes between GP_Matt and RatherDashing, even if people swapped they would have just swapped to GP_Matt. The only reason mafia would try and delay is if one of them were mafia, we know RatherDashing wasn't.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Delgar
-Yes I miscounted leading up to the hammer, however, before the hammer was dropped, I pointed out my count was wrong. In any event, RD was going to go, and I didn't see any reason to wait, he hadn't contributed at all and I don't think anything he had to say would help
|
He said he would be able to post that evening. Getting him out in the day, and stopping from potentially using his power in the evening, seems mafia-like behaviour to me.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Delgar
-There is not "no reason" to suspect Puxlut. Let me argue it better this time:
a. I didn't get a townie feeling about her day 1, as I didn't think her posts were really trying to zero in on mafia
|
That would have been a decent reason to vote for her, but that's not the reason you gave.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Delgar
b. We have to use the information we have, which is the mafia chose to kill devo22 and bizaro86.
|
I don't know if I completely agree that the mafia is the only one at work here, but generally I agree with this.
Quote:
|
c. I see nothing about their posts that makes them stick out as mafia, so we have to wonder why they chose those two. If we assume there are 6 mafia (which is a guess), the "chances" of picking any two specific townies for killing is 0.04%.
|
If they didn't stick out as mafia, that's probably the reason they went after them. And I don't get your odds here at all.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Delgar
d. Because there was no apparent reason to pick those two, lets consider how the mafia chose them. I am saying it is not coincidental that they offed the two most important characters in the nintendo universe.
|
Mario, absolutely the most iconic nintendo character. Donkey Kong? Nah. Pikachu? Sure, I can see the argument. Link? Yeah, Zelda is huge. Donkey Kong? Not so much. Iconic, but not the most iconic.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Delgar
e. They would have looked at their own abilities vs. their own characters. While Mazrim has said things were done randomly, he has also said that characters are "not necessarily" indicative of roles or powers. That to me is somewhat ambiguous of a statement. They may think they found a pattern amongst themselves (even if it was truly random, which I'm not sure of) and chose to test it out by offing Mario and Donkey Kong.
|
Okay, so let's assume they were going for the most iconic and Mario and DK are somehow the most iconic. Why would you go after Bowser? If he's the next most iconic, what's the logic?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Delgar
f. So I'm doing the same, simply by tossing a vote out against Mario's "natural" enemy. And I promptly get jumped upon by 3 posters....
|
But alignment is not determined by their character. This is fact, you choosing to go after a bad guy is simply wrong. You choosing to go after the most iconic is also something I don't buy.
This is on top of "forgetting" to vote and "accidentally" miscounting. Your posts aren't adding up to me, and for that reason I see you as most suspicious.