Quote:
Originally Posted by formulate
I don't think we've seen many 'wild' accusations. I think we've seen some votes based on thought-out theories with the minimal information we have available. I made a post early on about finding the balance between random lynching with no discussion, and complete chaos (or call it 'wild accusations').
We haven't come close to the 700+ post day 1 clusterfata from the last game. I was simply pointing out that you starting out posting very close to the left edge of my scale, if you will. Seeing that mafia members from last game had a similar style, and it would be an easy way to blend in, I cast a vote.
|
Correct, and I don't want it to go that way.
Last game, which was my first, I was convinced of something that wasnt there, and it hurt the town. I don't want to do that again.
I am really not against you voting for me (other than I know I am town) because at this point there is next to nothing to go on for all players, so the fact that me changing my play from last game is evident, it does have some logic to it.
Might be best to hold off a couple days, and see if you still feel the same way though. If I am not helping the town, due to time commitment issues or the changes in my play still are a concern for you, then go for it.
(note: If I was mafia, and you noticed a small thing in my playstyle that lead you to believe that was the case, there might be a valid strategy to keep it to yourself and hope I give you more clues. This is where my notes from last game really helped, is I was able to go back and piece together things that made me go 'hmmmm?' once more evidence was in play. Now that you have indicated that you have an issue with me, all I need to do is change my play
to what you expect and you will likely drop it, right?
That's partially why I didn't feel the need to start pointing out stuff right away. There was a bunch of action I could try and read, without giving people an indication that someone thought something was off)