Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar
No, you're not dumb. When you first posted the idea, I was like, MAFIA! Then I thought about it more and I could see how someone could go down that path of reasoning. A passive town is a dead town though, I think. The mafia will get it right every time in their kills, the town is going to hit the wrong target more than once in every game... to use that as a means for not shooting... is certain death over time.
At least now you are posting....
|
I mentioned in a previous post that I would have favored hammering Bizaro yesterday. If it turned out he was scum, that's a quick blow before the other mafia members could even blink. It would have been bold but risky because if we were wrong, we wouldn't have exposed any vote patterns and lost a day and a friend.
But since we didn't use the hammer (and even told the mafia we were slowing down the vote) we are in a bit of a stalemate now after all the inactives became active.
GGG: I see where you're coming from that the mafia probably likes to vote somewhere in the middle. However they know that too. If we dismiss too many things as "the mafia wouldn't do that" they'll start to do it.