Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Looger
i keep hearing this 'word would get out' argument.
it has!
Bring_Back_Shantz,
i've aready provided the links, i'm not a scientist, if anyone wants copies of the hard-hitting evidence, let me know.
|
Yes please,
I've already said I'd love to see independantly verified tests proving that the "thermite" found on the monument was the result of demolitions explosives, and one of the many other explinations that are probalby a lot more plausible, such as:
1) Thermite welding was used to repair parts of the building at some point or another
2) A thermite reaction occured naturally durring the destruction of the building
3) A thermite reaction was not used to cut or weld the parts of the memorial. I assume the pieces of this memorial were taken from the wreckage, and thermite reactions will occur when devices such as thermal lances (magnesium rods in an aluminum tube) are used. Thermal lances are often times used in salvage and rescue operations when large pieces of steel, such as building girders, need to be cut quickly, and making a nice clean cut is not necessary.
So go ahead, if you can send me that hard hitting proof please PM me and i'll send you my email address. But if you're just gonne gime me more arguements such as "They found thermite" and "They saw molten steel" then don't bother.