Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
No one is arguing the above bolded ridiculous straw-man position. Everyone agrees (I hope) that posts or threads that affirm or perpetuate historic stereotypes and prejudices based on unchangeable inherent personal characteristics (race, religion, age, gender, sexuality, etc.) are totally abhorrent and unacceptable. However, posts or threads criticizing Israel's policies or actions in Gaza, for example, or American gun policies, are perfectly legitimate (unless they become the former.)
|
Good then go take a look at those threads. Absolutely full of offensive stuff. Like I said offensive behavior is offensive behavior. The example put out there just to show that is exactly what is being condoned.
The site is well known for it's over the top anti-religious vitriol but that's alright cause those who are moderating are alright with it. But some scantily clad women are cause for outrage.
Sorry don't get it. You are either against offensive behavior or you are alright with the stance that says / there are offensive threads, if you don't like it don't come in the threads. That was seemingly the official position of the moderators previously / I'm just not seeing why it changed for one particular thread.