Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
I think criticizing religion is okay to an extent, but when posters are advocating for genocide, maybe that's a step too far?
|
Genocide and religion have nothing to do with one another.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug
I would suggest that "turning off" avatars is the same argument as "you don't have to click on the YLYL thread". It puts the onus on the offended person, rather than the offending person.
It will be a very interesting few weeks and months while the mods figure out the new guidelines and how to enforce same. I would suggest it is much more consistent to ban the sexy avatars on objectification grounds, which I think is at least part of the grounds for banning YLYL (recognizing that the commentary in the thread had to do with it as well).
|
No. It puts the onus on the responsible person. Avatars mean you cant be on the site at all period or turn them all off without question.
Individual threads mean that you have to exercise personal responsibility and restraint.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
Nobody asked doctajones to take his avatar down, though, unlike EG. I don't know about you, but I wasn't on the edge of my seat wondering just when he was going to weigh in. And his entire tone was confrontational, using "TOLD TO", as if the jackbooted thugs and commissars of the KCP would be daunted by his refusal to go quietly to the gulag.
|
You basterd. You stole my KCP remark! I'll see you in hell.