Quote:
Originally Posted by Daradon
Ok, I think I see where our disconnect is happening. Thank you for being open to at least try and figure this out. I think we're still going to disagree, but I think we're at least closer now, and we can probably at least agree to disagree. Feel free to continue after this if you like, I'm not saying this to end the discussion or get the last word.
Is the picture sexist? By her own definition or others? If she claimed the pictures themselves weren't sexist, then how can hers be sexist?
By her own definition, the pictures weren't the problem, so then how can hers be the problem? It was the constant rating of women, the lewd comments, the pervasive sexism of the board itself. NOT THE PICTURES.
So then, by at least her own definition, it's not hypocritical. Now you may disagree with her definition, (and that's fine) and if so, then you would have to make arguments on why you believe that picture is sexist (outside of the argument of having to remove all pictures to be fair, because as I mentioned, that hasn't been done yet anyway). To the board and to the mods if you so choose. But she was constant in her beliefs both logically and morally, and therefore, not hypocritical, even if you disagree with her beliefs.
And yeah, I know what hypocrite means, so no need to post it at the bottom of your post. I'm going to let that one go and not take it personally.
|
This is a great post, and I'm really enjoying this debate.
I need to absorb your argument before I respond, that was a hell of a return volley...
And I should do some actual work today
I meant no offense by posting the definition, if I did so, then I apologize.