View Single Post
Old 09-24-2014, 09:44 AM   #24
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
So basically what I'm hearing is that if you are unable to provide a hard statistic/facts on something, then it's 'hockey voodoo'?
Pretty much. Although I will say that the term "hockey voodoo" is itself a bit of an extreme, although not at all unwarranted. What is the difference between a belief in the power of prayer to effect the impact in one's life and the power of a hockey fight to change "momentum"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
Do you remember when Feaster iced the 2nd smallest team in the NHL? Because I do, and they weren't fond memories.
Yes. But "being big" is not the same thing as "fighting."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
I could tell the goalies felt helpless and knew that it would continue.
How could you tell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames View Post
The next season I noticed the other team getting trounced and various Flames keeping order. Good times were had by all and we weren't riddled with injuries compared to the year prior.
So, here is a great illustration of the term "hockey voodoo": "A" happened and then "B," ergo, "A" was the cause of "B."

The question of the relationship of hockey fights to the on ice outcome of games is something I am absolutely interested in. But I'm not simply content to take one's word for it. This is something that should be measurable, and until someone figures out how to do so, I will remain sceptical. Give me a convincing argument from evidence, and I will believe.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote