Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fotze
I usualy stick away from these threads because I'd rather dislike less people in my life. These arguments are impossible to argue against because anything you say means you hate life.
You know what, we die, stop being a bunch of pussies, cowards. The phrase "if it saves one life , then it is worth it" is ****. If we all believed this **** that we accept like a porn star darting their tongues out, then we should ban the following: - corners - how many bang their heads and how many fall into them causing death. Probably one a year. Ban corners!
- Hard surfaces - How many live would be saved if surfaces were less hard. (YOu mean you would choose the right to hard surfaces over life? Unreal)
- Cars - WE would save more lives than all terrorist attacks by banning cars.
- etc -
I will buy any argument for that bull**** terrorist argument that is pulled out of asses but when you pull that 'you choose life over X argument' you can go suck it because you are being a weasel and you know it. |
Come on fotze, there is no need to get worked up. I pretty much agree with you, although I still think the government should have some right for our protection of life. In other words, I believe in the military, our intelligance agencies and our efforts overseas, because they go a long way in the "protection of life."