Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cowperson
A brilliant comeback filled with logical riposte. 
Would you care to actually argue the point? If you can?
You have this thing of arguing for the sake of looking at your writing.
On occasion, that's true.  In this case, however, I've got my foot on your throat.
Cowperson |
Youve got your foot in your mouth more like it.
I agree that the bible is made up of years and years of interpretation and re interpretation. Many people are involved in its creation.
Wikipedia is quite different. Any joe blow can enter info into the data base. It may be an expert or it may be a dim wit. However, entire organizations have not been built on the teachings of Wikipedia as have with the Bible. Many many people have studied the Bible as cannot be said for Wikipedia.
Are there similarities? Of course.......as in any anything. But to me You cannot compare Wikipedia to the information in the Bible.