I like this thread.
It's literally impossible for one side to say anything without completely being judged by the other. It's not even okay to question or play devil’s advocate without instantly becoming a rapist or in support of rapists
1. Barber dude should have just cut the chicks hair
or
2. Chick should have just gone to a different place
If 1. happened, barber dude should have just continued after the haircut "as is" running his men’s barber
if 2. Happened, chick should have just continued on, going to the place that eventually cut her hair if they did a good job and thought barber dude was foolish for being out $20.
Productivity would have not decreased in Calgary.
Gross exaggerations would not have been made.
High horses would have been lonely.
I think had 1. or 2. happened the world would have been a better place.
Nothing else in this thread is accomplishing anything that is of more use than either of the two individuals doing 1. or 2.
|