Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
Not to answer for photon, but he's already addressed that exact point earlier in the thread. There was a court case in Canada that determined that female-only gyms were discriminatory, but the discrimination was considered justifiable by the court, so their existence is not a charter violation.
|
Thank you, I didn't see it anywhere (it's a pretty muddy thread).
Does that ruling give specific guidelines for what is deemed as "justifiable discrimination"? Seems like a pretty slippery slope, even if well-intentioned.