Arbitrarily saying 2% of GDP seems to be a recipe for mismanaging money and resources to me. I'd rather see an approach where clear goals are set for the role, size and make-up of our military as well as how often equipment needs to be upgraded/replaced, and using that to establish the cost. It could be 1% of the GDP or it could be more than 2%, but the budget should be based solely on what is needed to do the job properly.
|