View Single Post
Old 08-28-2014, 11:22 AM   #35
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foshizzle11 View Post
ya, I am not a fan of this. I want to see Sieloff or Wotherspoon get that 6th spot, or alternate for that spot. I think it is easier to shelter those guys on the back end than some of the other prospects in the top 6 for example.

I really hope we don't sign someone, if we can get one of those two out of Boston I would be ok with one of those moves.
Unless a rookie pushes themselves into a top6 role in camp, seiloff/wotherspoon would be better suited getting pro mins with the heat. It would be terrible having a kid in that #7 spot. When the flames say they're looking for depth d, i assume they are looking for a NHL caliber #7 so as to not be in a position to pull a kid who may not be ready or who won't be getting much ice time even if he gets dressed.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bubbsy For This Useful Post: