Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza
So now it is not racism, it is 'veiled' racism? What did the guy say where he proposes something racist? It is very clear to me you do not know what racism is. If this guy (I really know nothing about him besides the video) claimed that black people cannot act reasonably or whatever because they are black, that is racism. If on the other hand he says this one person is too attached to the crime that he should probably get someone else to step in, that is different, and that is what I interpreted in the argument.
His points are not exactly new or horrible - would this have been the spectacle it has become if it was a black police officer who did the shooting and a black victim? Would Holder be on scene for that circumstance? The answer is yes by the way, according to the lady, who claimed his appearance is by request of the sheriff or something.
This guy may be loose with his choice of words, but to claim he judges black people differently based on this clip is really stretching.
|
He's saying he's too attached to the crime because he's black. Not because he's a man, not because he's an american and not because he's the attorney general, it's because he's black and has experienced racism himself.
Nage, racism is the belief that a person is superior or deficient based solely on their racial appearance, and the inherited qualities of that race.
The host believes the top prosecutor in the united states is unfit to oversee an investigation because of a supposed biased due to his blackness.
That he recognized existing racism and racial tension in the United States 5 years ago during his swearing in makes him, in the eyes of the host, unfit to judge others (in this scenario specifically, whites), supposedly because he will be unable to remain impartial, due to his blackness.
The host believes the Attorney General is inherently unable to apply justice evenly because of his race.
That.Is.Racist.