Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel
I again state the better man at arguing won. It does not mean those were actual facts. Many times the defense has gotten things stricken from the record that legally could have swung the case.
|
Okay, so you agree that the defense attorney was better than the prosecutor?
We, and pretty much every single person who followed the case, felt that way.
And while it's not perfect, that means the guilty-verdict was reasonable and justified. You can't start putting away and finding people guilty because you think someone committed a crime, you need to prove it in a court of law. You seem to agree that didn't happen. What's the argument? Do you disagree with the innocent until proven guilty? Or do you believe that Zimmerman was somehow proven guilty?