Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
The first two are absolutely valid questions since the cop who shot him didn't even know of the robbery when he stopped him. Where's the problem with those two statements?
As for the third, yeah it's a robbery.
|
Are you talking about the conclusions to the tape?
The first one I said is very reasonable question/argument. I don't have a problem with it.
The second one of drawing a conclusion that he deserved to die for that is extremely biased and void of any facts of the actual incident. It's not happening so much here, thankfully, but check the comments of some websites where the top comments are "another criminal off the street, I don't see a problem" or "good for him defending himself against this criminal." And of course a bunch of racist stuff. I have a problem with those just as much as I do anyone calling the cop a murderer when there was no facts.