Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey
Clearly you are biased if you think an investigation by cops of cops is going to reveal anything. If Eric Holder and the Justice Department clears the guy then I would believe that, the kangaroo court that is an internal cop investigation, no. The fact is that in any other situation where an unarmed man gets shot 6 times the guy doing the shooting gets charged with murder. Somehow this cop has not been charged with murder. Why have they not started a murder investigation? In any other situation there would be a murder investigation, instead it sure appears to be an attempt at an internal coverup. Releasing his name late, then releasing it on the same day that you for reasons that nobody can explain release tape of the robbery,
Charge the guy with murder and let a jury of his peers from Ferguson judge him, just like the judicial system is suppose to work.
|
I would think that the first thing that any defense attorney would do would be to move the trial away from Ferguson, I doubt there is any way that they can get a un tainted jury.
Second of all, I don't think that there is enough evidence to go to trial, that's why the investigation was on-going. We still have conflicting witnesses, the forensics isn't near complete yet, or do you just want to rush to conviction?
If you go to trial based on an emotional demand, and the defense cuts it to threads you can't retrial.
At this point there is lots of oversight on this, but you can't rush it to trial because it makes people feel better.
This isn't a kangeroo court system like the Soviet Union in the mid 60's.