Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
My definition of a violent criminal would include someone who was convicted of committing a violent crime. Again this incident has nothing to do with his killing, it is being used to justify it after the fact.
|
Way to move the goalposts. First you were asking
Quote:
|
in what world is that a "robbery"? Or make him a "violent criminal" as some keep parroting? Just pure lunacy from some of you on this.
|
Now it's because he wasn't convicted?
We're looking at the robbery. Was it a robbery? It's a very easy yes. He stole some items, he attacked and threaten a man while doing so. Robbery is a violent crime. No, he wasn't convicted, but that wasn't what your original question was.
And yes, you're right, it does not mean he deserved to be shot.