Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
Despite the fact that this event has zero to do with the killing of Michael Brown other than to attempt to posthumously attack his character my question is this: in what world is that a "robbery"? Or make him a "violent criminal" as some keep parroting? Just pure lunacy from some of you on this.
|
He physically attacks a cashier after taking cigars that didn't belong to him?
Is the argument now that it was just "a little push"? Yawn, look what he did at the shop should absolutely not have been reason to shoot him. But what he did at the shop was make him a violent criminal. You can't attack someone who's trying to stop you from leaving and then claim not to be a violent criminal. Period.