Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin
Booo. I see what you're saying, but Oling Roachinin is one of those guys, only his guy is the cop.
Everyone's biased, it's natural. OR is biasing towards the cop, you can tell because he's building a narrative about the victim and speculating on what likely happened.
Nobody cares that he has a different opinion, our issue is that he's speculating about what the victim likely did to get himself killed and at the same time, calling those who are critical of the cop out for speculating and not waiting for the facts to come out.
Of course there's bias, but don't speculate on one side of the coin while telling those you disagree with not to speculate.  |
I've also been abundantly clear that if the autopsy collaborates with the eye witness statements that the officer was in the wrong and should be convicted of murder. My bias isn't towards the police, I realize there is good and bad cops. At this point the officer could be either.
I do have a bias towards violent criminals, but I think that's far more than reasonable...
Regardless, you keep avoiding the question, what would it take for you to believe the officer wasn't a cold blooded murderer? Let's set a bar. If the eye witness reports are wrong about the shooting him in the back will that change your mind? If not, what will? I'm just curious.