Certainly some people who hate having their pre conceived biases challenged by actually looking to facts before making determinations here. And then to get so wound up at the person who is challenging those biases, and to try to minimize him in such a desperate way.
So far we have a criminal who had a run in with a cop. Either the cop killed him without just cause, or the criminal attacked the cop. The evidence one way or another is the only way to determine that.
One group in this thread is cheering for 'their' guy, while Roachinen is cheering for balanced reasoning and some critical thinking.
|