View Single Post
Old 08-16-2014, 05:10 PM   #296
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
The only evidence that he went for the gun would come from the cop. I'm not sure why I should believe that. No one else has corroborated the claim that he went for the gun. To me the word that is most likely right now is the witness who wasn't Michael Brown's friend who said he was running when he was first shot, first in the back then in the front.
Okay, fair enough. So you're saying that if there isn't evidence he was shot in the back you will say the cop is innocent (or let's say more accurately not guilty) then?
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote