Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
Past actions inform speculation on current events.
|
I agree. But that goes both ways. It was combustiblefuel who said the violent crime that Michael Brown committed 10 minutes before the incident should not be discussed.
But nik-, I'm not trying to bait you or anything like that. I have said multiple times if the eye witnesses reports are collaborated with the coroner's report and the FBI investigation shows some damning evidence it will be hard to defend the officer's actions. Shooting an unarmed man in the back and when he's turned around with his arms up surrendering is murder, nothing could excuse the actions of the officer if that was the case.
But if the coroner's report and investigation come back differently what will it take for you to say that the officer was innocent? Just curious. There's people, heck people in this thread, who had already came to the conclusion that the officer was a murderer and will not change their view. Seems odd that the question gets avoided.