View Single Post
Old 08-16-2014, 04:05 PM   #235
Devils'Advocate
#1 Goaltender
 
Devils'Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

I try not to agree with Rerun.

All I am saying is that unless a polling company is scrupulous in their methodology, there will be biases and not a true random sampling. I do know that almost all polling companies oversample older people and under sample parents of school aged children and young people. Why? Because older people are the most likely to answer a random call out of the phone book. Younger people either don't have a number in the phone book or they are not at home to answer it. So knowing that there are biases, some of which can be identified and some we don't even think of, we have to take polls with a grain of salt. They can show trends and can give ballpark numbers, but don't expect exact predictions. If they were to follow our methodology, they would be too expensive to run. Rerun *could* be right. He might not be. But sampling size increases would only get you MORE elderly people with land lines. When your sample is not truly random, no matter what your sample size, biases of all kind can take place.

Last edited by Devils'Advocate; 08-16-2014 at 04:08 PM.
Devils'Advocate is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Devils'Advocate For This Useful Post: