Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
Actually it was eyewitness account.
Don't try to be a smartass if you're not 100% sure you're right.
|
In Michael Brown's "credit" (for lack of better words) there's been multiple eyewitness accounts, including those of his accomplish in the robbery, that have stated he was shot in the back.
I believe anyone defending the officer will have a hard time doing so if the coroner report correlates the story that he was shot in the back from a distance, turned around and then shot multiple times with his hands up. My argument is, and always will be in cases like this, to let the facts and evidence speak for themselves.
But what if the coroner report doesn't show Michael Brown shot in the back? How many people who were so quick to call out the officer as a racist murderer will actually change their views? Will you?