Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawnski
In all your examples, you are specifying a single option, not a range of choices. In the case of the labourer, if that person desires to be the owner of a software company they can make choices that, over time, can yield that result. He/she can learn, develop ideas, crowd source funds and ultimately reach his/her goal.
|
In fact, it would be utterly impossible for anyone to own a software company in the absence of a state. I suppose libertarianism is fair in that sense: life's choices would be brutally limited for everyone (although no doubt more limited for some [i.e., the weak] than others.)
EDIT: Indeed, it would be utterly impossible to "own" anything without some sort of state or authority.